IS IT RIGHT:
To Judge, To Expose Error, & To Call Names?
By Pastor E.L. Bynum.
Tabernacle Baptist Church, Lubbock, Texas. USA
Many today believe that it is wrong to expose error and to name names. Liberals have always seemed to believe this, but in recent times it has been widely espoused by evangelicals and charismatics. Now we are seeing the same fatal error being declared by those who profess to be Bible believing fundamentalists. Those who are faithful in exposing error according to the Bible are now being widely denounced, and are accused of being unloving and unkind. We intend here to present the teaching of the Bible on this vital subject.
I. It Is Right To Practice Biblical Judgement.
One of the most misused verses in the Bible is, â€œJudge not, that ye be not judgedâ€ (Matt. 7:1). Every Scripture verse should be read in its context, if we are to properly understand the true meaning. In vs. 2-5 of this same chapter it is evident that v.1 is referring to hypocritical judgement. A brother who has a beam in his own eye should not be judging the brother who may have a mote in his eye. The lesson is plain, you cannot judge another for his sin if you are guilty of the same sin.
Those who cling to â€œJudge not, that ye be not judged,â€ to condemn those who expose error should read the entire chapter. Jesus said, â€œBeware of false prophets, which come to you in sheepâ€™s clothing…â€ (v.15). How can we know false prophets unless we judge them by the Word of God? If we know the false prophets, how can we fail to warn the sheep of these â€œravening wolves?â€ All through the Bible we find proof that they should be identified and exposed.
â€œYe shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruitâ€ (v.16,17). Did the Lord mean that we could not judge the tree (person), by the fruit of their life and doctrine? Certainly not, for you cannot know without judging. All judgement should be on the basis of Bible teaching, not according to whims or prejudices.
â€œJudge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgementâ€ (John 7:24). Here our Lord commands that we are to â€œjudge righteous judgement,â€ which is judgement based upon the Word of God. If judgement is made upon any other basis, other than the Word of God, it is a violation of Matt. 7:1. Websterâ€™s Dictionary says that a judge is â€œone who declares the law.â€ The faithful Christian must discern or judge on the basis of Godâ€™s inspired law, the Bible.
A fornicator is described in 1 Cor. 5:1-13. Paul â€œjudgedâ€ (v.3) the man even though he was absent, and he told the church at Corinth that they were to â€œjudgeâ€ (v.12) those that were within. The Greek word for â€œjudgeâ€ is the same here as in Matt. 7:1. Paul did not violate â€œjudge not, that ye be not judged,â€ in judging the man, nor in instructing the Church to judge also. All of this judgement was according to the Word of God.
A person who is able to discern between good and evil, has at least one of the major marks of spiritual maturity. â€œBut strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.â€ (Heb. 5:14). W.E. Vine says of the meaning of discern, “a distinguishing, a clear discrimination, discerning, judging; it is translated `discerningâ€™ in 1 Cor. 12:10 of discerning spirits, judging by evidence whether they are evil or of God.â€ Strong also agrees that it means to judge.
Those who are unwilling or incapable of discerning or judging between good and evil are in this manner revealing either their disobedience or their immaturity.
II. It Is Right To Expose False Teachers.
False teachers are free to spread their poisonous doctrines today because there is a conspiracy of silence among many bible believers. Wolves in sheepâ€™s clothing are thus enabled to ravage the flock, thereby destroying many.
John the Baptist called the Pharisees and Sadducees (the religious leaders of his day) â€œa generation of vipersâ€ (snakes) (Matt. 3:7). Today, he would be accused of being unloving, unkind, and unchristian.
Jesus said to the religious Pharisees, â€œO generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speakethâ€ (Matt. 12:34). To many evangelicals and some fundamentalists, this would be unacceptable language today, but it is biblical language and it came from the mouth of the Son of God.
Standing face to face with these false teachers, Jesus Christ the Son of God, called them â€œhypocrites,â€ â€œblind guides,â€ â€œblind,â€ â€œwhited sepulchres,â€ â€œserpents,â€ and â€œye generation of vipersâ€ (Matthew 23:13-33). Yet, we are told today that we are to fellowship with men whose doctrines are just as unscriptural as those of the Pharisees. Some who say they are Bible believing Christians insist on working with Roman Catholics and other assorted heretics. Yet, according to many, we are not supposed to rebuke them for their compromise.
Near the beginning of His ministry, â€œJesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changersâ€™ money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Fatherâ€™s house an house of merchandiseâ€ (John 2:13-16). Our Saviour is presented today as one who was meek, lowly, kind, and loving, even to false teachers, but this is entirely false. When dealing with false teachers and prophets, His words were sharp and His actions plain.
Near the end of His public ministry, Christ found it necessary to cleanse the temple once again. The exposure of false doctrines and practices is a never ending job. At that time He said, â€œIs it not written, My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer? But ye have made it a den of thievesâ€ (Mark 11:17). Is it any different today? The thieves come into the house of God, and rob Godâ€™s people of the Bible and peddle their perverted Bibles instead. At the same time this den of thieves rob the people of the doctrine of separation and the doctrine of sanctification. Then you can hardly tell Godâ€™s people from the people of the world. In all honesty, should not these thieves (false teachers) be exposed?
In our day these false teachers have come into the churches with their books, literature, movies, psychology, seminars, and have turned the Fatherâ€™s house into a den of thieves. It is time that men of God stand up and expose their errors for all to see.
The Bible Admonishes Us To Expose Error.
We are to TRY them.
â€œBeloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits, whether they be of God; because many false prophets are gone out into the worldâ€ (1 John 4:1). All doctrine and teachers are to be tried according to the Word of God. â€œTo the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in themâ€ (Isa. 8:20). Every message, messenger, and method is to be judged according to the Word of God. The church at Ephesus was commended because they had â€œtried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liarsâ€ (Rev. 2:2). It is never right to tolerate false teachers, but they are to be tried by the Word of God, and exposed. Of course those who want to disobey the Word of God will seek by every means to avoid this teaching.
We are to MARK them and AVOID them.
â€œNow I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid themâ€ (Rom. 16:17). Those whose conduct and teaching contradicts the Word of God are to be marked and to be avoided. This requires discernment and judgement in the light of the Bible. The ecumenicalists, new evangelicals, and compromising fundamentalists will resist any effort to obey this Scripture. They cannot be marked and avoided, unless they are judged according to the Word of God.
We are to REBUKE them.
â€œWherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faithâ€ (Titus 1:13). This was written to Titus, because there were those going from house to house and subverting whole houses with false doctrine (v.10-16). Oral Roberts, Robert Schuller, Rodney Howard-Browne, Pat Robertson, and others are subverting whole houses with their false doctrine today. Are we to sit silently by, while they do this, without rebuking and admonishing people to avoid their teaching? No, the faithful servant of the Lord is to be â€œHolding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and convince the gainsayersâ€ (Titus 1:9).
We are to have NO FELLOWSHIP with them.
â€œAnd have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove themâ€ (Eph. 5:11). Reprove means to censure, condemn, find fault, rebuke, and to refute. How can we obey this Scripture unless we try them by the Word of God?
We are to WITHDRAW from them.
â€œNow we command you, brethren, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which ye received of usâ€ (2 Thess. 3:6). We are to withdraw from those whose doctrine and conduct does not conform to the Word of God. The context clearly shows that obedience to sound doctrine is what Paul has in mind, for he says, â€œif any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed. Yet, count him not as an enemy but admonish him as a brother. (2 Thess. 3:14-15). Paul admonished Timothy to â€œwithdraw thyselfâ€ from those who â€œconsent not to wholesome words … and to the doctrine which is according to godlinessâ€ (1 Timothy 6:3-5). This is usually an unpopular and thankless task but it is the duty of the God-called man.
We are NOT to RECEIVE them into our house.
â€œIf there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deedsâ€ (2 John 10,11). There is no doubt about who John is speaking about, it is â€œWhosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ…â€ (v.9). By radio, TV, and literature, false prophets are brought into the homes of many Christians today. Brethren, this ought not to be!
We are to REJECT HERETICS.
â€œA man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition rejectâ€ (Titus 3:10). We should reject those why deny redemption by the blood of Christ. There are many who deny this or some other doctrine of the Word of God. If they will not respond to being admonished, then they are to be rejected.
We are to look out for those who preach another gospel. Paul warned about those who preached â€œanother Jesus….another spirit … or another gospelâ€ (2 Cor. 11:4). How can we know them unless we judge their Jesus, their spirit, and their gospel by the Word of God? Paul called such preachers â€œfalse apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christâ€ (2 Cor. 11:13). He explains in v.14-15 that these preachers are the ministers of Satan. The God-called man must be just as faithful today in exposing the ministers of Satan.
Paul warned the Galatians about those who â€œpervert the gospel of Christ.â€ He also said, â€œIf any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursedâ€ (see Gal. 1:6-9). Multitudes today are preaching a perverted gospel. Those who teach salvation by baptism, or by works, are teaching a perverted gospel. Those who preach a salvation that you can lose, are preaching a perverted gospel. The charismatics, Catholics, many evangelicals, and many fundamentalists(?) are preaching a perverted gospel. Yet, we are supposed to cooperate with them in evangelism and Christian work, according to many today. If we fail to expose these false prophets, then we have betrayed Christ and His gospel.
We are to SEPARATE from them.
â€œWherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive youâ€ (2 Cor. 6:17). This makes it plain. Godâ€™s people are to come out of apostasy and religious error. How can any Bible believer remain in the National Council or World Council of Churches? How can they remain in the Southern Baptist Convention, or any of the other apostate organizations? How can they remain among compromising evangelicals and wishy-washy fundamentalists?
III. It Is Right To Name Names.
Many mistakenly believe that it is wrong to expose error and to name the guilty teachers; but they are wrong according to the Bible.
Paul named Peter publicly. Peter was guilty of unscriptural practice. â€œBut when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed…But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of the Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?â€ (Gal. 2:11-14). The whole issue revolved around salvation by the law or by grace. When the integrity and purity of the gospel is at stake, then we have no choice when it comes to the matter of exposing error and naming names.
Paul named Demas for loving the world. â€œFor Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present worldâ€ (2 Tim. 4:10). Those who forsake the cause of Christ for worldly living and pleasure should be named and exposed.
Paul named Hymenaeus and Alexander. Paul told Timothy to â€œwar a good warfare; Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some have put away concerning faith have made shipwreck: Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blasphemeâ€ (1 Tim. 1:18-20). Godâ€™s true servants should war a good warfare, and name those who have departed from the faith that was once delivered to the saints. Paul is not here discussing the faith of salvation but the faith was a system of doctrine. These men had made shipwreck of it and Paul exposed them and called their names.
Paul named Hymenaeus and Philetus. He told Timothy to â€œstudyâ€ that he might be able to â€œrightlyâ€ divide â€œthe word of truth. But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. And their word will eat as doth as canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of someâ€ (2 Tim. 2:15-18). False doctrine overthrows the faith of some, so those who are proclaiming it must be exposed.
Paul named Alexander the coppersmith. â€œAlexander the coppersmith did me much evil: the Lord reward him according to his works: Of whom be thou ware also; for he hath greatly withstood our wordsâ€ (2 Tim. 4:14-15). It is clear that this is not a personality problem, but a doctrinal problem. Alexander had withstood the words and doctrine of Paul. He was an enemy to the truth. Godly pastors face the same problem every day. They stand and proclaim the truth, then their members go home and hear this truth disputed by radio and TV preachers. Often times these false prophets are sending their publications into the homes of members of true churches. Then the man of God is supposed to keep his mouth shut, according to many. Only a coward will be silent when the truth of the Bible is under attack.
John named Diotrephes. â€œI wrote unto the church; but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the pre-eminence among them, receiveth us notâ€ (3 John 9). He related how this man had prated again him â€œwith malicious wordsâ€ (v.10). He further said, â€œBeloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God, but he that doeth evil hath not seen Godâ€ (v.11). It is not wrong to name those whose doctrine and practice is contrary to the Word of God.
In fact, the whole Bible abounds in examples of false prophets being named and exposed. All this modern day talk about love, used as an excuse for not exposing error, is not really biblical love but is really sloppy agape.
Moses called the name of Balaam. (See Num. 22-25). Peter exposed â€œthe way of Balaam…who loved the wages of unrighteousnessâ€ (2 Pet. 2:15). Balaam was a prophet that was in the work for money, just like some of the TV false prophets today. They beg for money and live like kings, while multitudes of innocent people send them hard earned money. They are always building colleges, hospitals, TV network satellites, and amusement parks that have a water slide for Jesus. And then we are supposed to keep our mouth shut about these religious charlatans. How can we be silent and be true to God?
Jude exposed â€œthe error Balaamâ€ (Jude 11). John exposed â€œthe doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornicationâ€ (Rev. 2:14). This gets right to the heart of the matter, concerning the doctrine of separation. Balaam never did curse Israel even though he wanted the wages that he was offered to do so. The men of Israel committed â€œwhoredom with the daughters of Moab …and bowed down to their godsâ€ (Num. 25:1,2). Why did they do this? Because Balaam taught Balac how to break down the barrier of separation between the Moabites and the Israelites. We know this to be so because it is plainly stated in Rev. 2:14 and Num. 31:16. This sin resulted in 24,000 men of Israel dying under the judgement of God.
False teachers are breaking down the barrier of separation between Godâ€™s people and false religion. There is too little preaching and teaching on the doctrine of separation. Balaam breached the doctrine of personal separation by causing the men of Israel to commit fornication with the Moabite women. He breached the doctrine of ecclesiastical separation by causing the men of Israel to bow down to Baal. This bought a curse upon Israel. Until we get back to teaching the truth about personal and ecclesiastical separation, we can expect the continued widespread havoc that we have today.
It seems to be believed by many that some people are too high and mighty to be named or exposed. Men in high places, pastors of large churches, and those with great radio or TV audiences, are supposedly above criticism. Whatever they may do or say, no matter how contrary to the Bible it may be, is supposedly all right. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Nathan identified the man. There was a man in a very high place who was a secret adulterer. Surely this man who held the highest office in the land could not be rebuked by a lowly unpopular prophet. Nathan went right into the presence of David, revealed the sin in a parable form, and then told the enraged David, â€œThou art the manâ€ (2 Sam. 12:7).
Hanani named king Jehoshophat. In many ways Jehoshophat was a good king, but he mistakenly forgot to practice religious separation. He caused his son to marry wicked king Ahabâ€™s daughter. (See 2 Chron. 18:1; 21:1-6). He made an alliance with Ahab and went to the battle of Ramoth-Gilead with him (2 Chron. 19:2). We have a question for those who insist on working with charismatics, Catholics, and members of the National Council of Churches. â€œShouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord?â€
Yes, it is right to expose error and to name those who are in error.
It is right to â€œearnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saintsâ€ (Jude 3). It was once delivered and it has never been recalled for revision. We had better beware of â€œfalse teachers … who privily shall bring in damnable heresiesâ€ (2 Pet. 2:1). Faithful messengers will warn the sheep of these heretics, and identify them by name. It is not enough to broadly hint of their identity, for the young lambs will not understand and will be destroyed by the wolves.
Article Used With Permission.
To obtain this article in printed form, please contact Tabernacle Baptist Church at: